Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Phys-L] Re: Momentum



Maybe I can clarify the question. I think David knows quite well that once
we use momentum conservation here, then the KE must be 1/2 the initial.
But, how is it that the channels into which the KE is converted, which seem
somewhat random and non-specific, always somehow are able to convert
exactly 50% of the KE into other forms?

I'll take a crack at it. I think you have to look at it the other way
around. The conservation of momentum dictates that only 50% of the initial
energy is available for KE in the final system. We have to keep reminding
ourselves that this energy thing is just a book-keeping system. Since 50%
is NOT available as KE, it will find its way into other forms--deformations
and thermal energy primarily. Momentum conservation is primary here and
sets the energy parameters. [That's my feeble attempt.]

Rick

***************************************************
R.W.Tarara
Professor of Physics
Saint Mary's College
Notre Dame, Indiana
Free Physics Instructional Software
Windows & Mac
www.saintmarys.edu/~rtarara/software.html
***********************************************



[Original Message]
From: jbellina <jbellina@SAINTMARYS.EDU>
To: <PHYS-L@LISTS.NAU.EDU>
Date: 12/5/2005 8:27:53 PM
Subject: Re: Momentum

The final state has two particles stuck together, so the mass is
doubled. By momentum conservation, the velocity must be half. Since
the ke is proportional to the mass and to the velocity squared, the
total ke afterwards is half what it was in the beginning. That is
ideal. You can ask what happens to energy, but that is a different
question. As you mentioned, depending on the circumstances the
energy can be lost in a variety of pathways. Have I missed something?

joe

Joseph J. Bellina, Jr. Ph.D.
Professor of Physics
Saint Mary's College
Notre Dame, IN 46556

On Dec 5, 2005, at 7:55 PM, David Abineri wrote:

In the ideal case of two equal masses colliding linearly where one is
stationary and one is moving whereby they stick together after the
collision (totally inelastic), the conservation of momentum leads
to the
conclusion that half the kinetic energy is lost to other forms. Of
course, in the real world, one has sound, deflection of materials,
friction at least that will convert the energy to other forms.

But what does this really say? What do the "ideal" conditions mean?
Why, regardless of the masses is exactly half of the kinetic energy
lost. When we say "ideal" conditions to we mean frictionless, rigid
objects in an airless world?

Can someone help make some sense out of this? I wish I could make the
question more clear so perhaps it is my lack of clarity about the
situation that is the cause of the question. Any help in clarifying
this issue would be appreciated. David Abineri

--
dabineri@fuse.net
_______________________________________________
Phys-L mailing list
Phys-L@electron.physics.buffalo.edu
https://www.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l