Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Phys-L] Is Dewey-like Pedagogy Relatively Successful? (was Re: Piaget & Dewey. . .) - PART 2



REFERENCES
Ansbacher, T. 2000. "An interview with John Dewey on science
education." The Physics Teacher 38(4): 224-227; freely online at
<http://www.scienceservs.com/id13.html> as a 1.3 MB pdf.

Beichner, R.J & J.M. Saul. 2003. "Introduction to the SCALE-UP
(Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate
Programs) Project," submitted to the Proceedings of the International
School of Physics "Enrico Fermi", Varenna, Italy, (July 2003) online
at <http://www.ncsu.edu/per/Articles/Varenna_SCALEUP_Paper.pdf> (1MB).

Bloom, B.S. 1984. "The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of
Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring," Educational
Researcher 13(6), 4-16 (1984). Bloom wrote: "Using the standard
deviation (sigma) of the control (conventional) class, it was
typically found that the average student under tutoring was about two
standard deviations above the average of the control class. . . The
tutoring process demonstrates that MOST of the students do have the
potential to reach this high level of learning. I believe an
important task of research and instruction is to seek ways of
accomplishing this under more practical and realistic conditions than
the one-to-one tutoring, which is too costly for most societies to
bear on a large scale. This is the '2 sigma' problem."

Cheng, K.K., B.A. Thacker, R.L. Cardenas, & C. Crouch. 2004. "Using
an online homework system enhances students' learning of physics
concepts in an introductory physics course," Am. J. Phys. 72:
1447-1453.

Crouch, C.H. & E. Mazur. 2001. "Peer Instruction: Ten years of
experience and results," Am. J. Phys. 69: 970-977; online at
<http://mazur-www.harvard.edu/library.php>, search "All Education
Areas" for author "Crouch" (without the quotes).

Ehrlich, R. 2002. "How do we know if we are doing a good job in
physics teaching?" Am. J. Phys. 70(1); 24-29.

FLAG. 2005. "Field-tested Learning Assessment Guide; online at
<http://www.flaguide.org/>: ". . . offers broadly applicable,
self-contained modular classroom assessment techniques (CAT's) and
discipline-specific tools for STEM [Science, Technology, Engineering,
and Mathematics] instructors interested in new approaches to
evaluating student learning, attitudes and performance. Each has been
developed, tested, and refined in real colleges and universities
classrooms." Assessment tools for physics and astronomy (and other
disciplines) are at <http://www.flaguide.org/tools/tools.php>.

Hake, R.R. 1998a. "Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A
six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory
physics courses," Am. J. Phys. 66: 64-74; online as ref. 24 at
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake>, or simply click on
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/ajpv3i.pdf> (84 kB).

Hake, R.R. 1998b. "Interactive-engagement methods in introductory
mechanics courses," online as ref. 25 at
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake>, or simply click on
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/IEM-2b.pdf> (108 kB) - a
crucial companion paper to Hake (1998a).

Hake, R.R. 2002a. "Lessons from the physics education reform effort,"
Ecology and Society 5(2): 28; online at
<http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol5/iss2/art28/>. Ecology and Society
(formerly Conservation Ecology) is a free online "peer-reviewed
journal of integrative science and fundamental policy research" with
about 11,000 subscribers in about 108 countries. See also Hake
(2002b,c).

Hake, R. R. 2002b. "Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods
in mechanics instruction," APS Forum on Education Newsletter, Summer
1998, pp. 5-7 and ref. 26 at <http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake>
or download directly by clicking on
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/FOEN-1e.pdf> (16 kB).

Hake, R.R. 2002c. "Assessment of Physics Teaching Methods,
Proceedings of the UNESCO-ASPEN Workshop on Active Learning in
Physics, Univ. of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, 2-4 Dec. 2002; also online
as ref. 29 at
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake/>, or download directly by clicking on
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake/Hake-SriLanka-Assessb.pdf> (84 kB)

Hake, R.R. 2002d. "Comment on Ehrlich (2002); online as ref. 17 at
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake> or download directly by
clicking on
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake/HakeOnEhrlich-2.pdf> (40 kB).

Hake, R.R. 2005. "Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - FORWARD
from Kieran Egan," online at
<http://lists.nau.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0510&L=phys-l&F=&S=&P=56840>.
Post of 28 Oct 2005 16:30:28-0700 to AP-Physics, Biopi-L, Chemed-L,
Physhare, PhysLnrR, & Physoc.

Heron, P.R.L. & D. Meltzer. 2005. "The future of physics education
research: Intellectual challenges and practical concerns," Amer. J.
Phys. 73(5): 390-394; online at
<http://www.physics.iastate.edu/per/articles/index.html>, scroll
downto "invited papers," or download directly by clicking on
<http://www.physics.iastate.edu/per/docs/Heron-Meltzer.pdf> (56kB).

Hoellwarth, C., M.J. Moelter, & R.D. Knight. 2005. "A direct
comparison of conceptual learning and problem solving ability in
traditional and studio style classrooms," Am. J. Phys. 73: 459-462.

Lamoreaux, S.K. 2001. "Impressions of physics education," Am. J.
Phys. 69(6): 633.

McCray, R.A., R.L. DeHaan, J.A. Schuck, eds. 2003. "Improving
Undergraduate Instruction in Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics: Report of a Workshop" Committee on Undergraduate STEM
Instruction," National Research Council, National Academy Press;
online at <http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10711.html>.
Physicists/astronomers attending the workshop were Paula Herron,
Priscilla Laws, John Lehman, Ramon Lopez, Richard McCray, Lillian
McDermott, Carl Wieman, Jack Wilson, and (believe it or not) the FLAG
(2005)-waving Mike Zeilik.

Phillips, D.C. 2000. "Expanded social scientist's bestiary: a guide
to fabled threats to, and defenses of, naturalistic social science."
Rowman & Littlefield.

Roos, K. "Don't Lecture Me on Lectures," Fall 2002 issue of APS
"Forum on Education Newsletter, online for APS members at
<http://www.aps.org/units/fed/newsletters/fall2002/dontlecturemeonlectures.cfm>.

Savinainen A. & P. Scott. 2002a. "The Force Concept Inventory: a tool
for monitoring student learning," Phys. Educ. 37: 45-52; online at
<http://kotisivu.mtv3.fi/oma/physics/downloads.html>.

Savinainen A. & P. Scott. 2002b. "Using the Force Concept Inventory
to monitor student learning and to plan teaching," Phys. Educ. 37:
53-58; online at
<http://kotisivu.mtv3.fi/oma/physics/downloads.html>.

Savinainen A. 2004. "High School Students' Conceptual Coherence of
Qualitative Knowledge in the Case of the Force Concept,"
Dissertations 41, Dept. of Physics, University of Joensuu, Finland,
online at <http://kotisivu.mtv3.fi/physics/downloads.html>.

Stith, J. H., D. Campbell, P. Laws, E. Mazur, W. Buck, & D. Kirk.
2002. "Importance of Physics Education Research," Am. J. Phys. 70(1):
11.

Uretsky, J. 2005. "Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - FORWARD
from Kieran Egan," Phys-L post of 28 Oct 2005 22:24:07-0500; online
at <http://lists.nau.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0510&L=phys-l&O=A&P=56983>.

THE END !!