Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Phys-L] Re: Energy is primary and fundamental?



Why is it important to answer that question? There are many other
questions that could be asked and answered. Does finding the answer
to that question help the student develop any better understanding of
the physical situation?

just wondering

joe
On Aug 17, 2005, at 1:50 PM, rlamont wrote:

What is your approach to the following simple problem? A ball is
dropped from rest and falls for 5 seconds. Without using
acceleration, just energy, calculate its speed at the end of the
5 seconds?

Bob at PC


-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for Physics Educators [mailto:PHYS-
L@list1.ucc.nau.edu] On Behalf Of Dan Schroeder
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 7:08 PM
To: PHYS-L@LISTS.NAU.EDU
Subject: Re: Energy is primary and fundamental?

Apologies for joining this discussion rather late. I guess I'm

one of

the "some physicists" mentioned below, although I've never

taught high

school or even a standard Physics 101 college course. However,

for

three years I did teach an honors physical science course, with

energy

as the unifying concept, for college students who were not

majoring in

science.

For that course I wrote some text materials which you can

download

from
<http://physics.weber.edu/schroeder/energy/>. Don't get your

hopes

up--these materials are not even close to being a textbook.

Rather,

they're a very terse overview of the core physics that students

were

expected to learn, with a collection of student exercises. In

the

course, these materials were supplemented by additional

readings

from a
wide variety of other sources, plus hands-on experiments and

other

activities. By the way, if you read Chapter 2 you'll see that

I did

not (nor was it my goal to) eliminate all reference to force

and work.

However, I did pretty much eliminate acceleration!

Another excellent resource is Bob Romer's old book, Energy: An
Introduction to Physics (Freeman, 1976, unfortunately out of

print).


Without trying to get into an argument with those who feel that

this

approach to physics is idiotic, here is a list of some of the
advantages that I see:

* Energy is a familiar concept in everyday life, tangible

because we

pay for it (in dollars, pounds gained, etc.).
* Energy is an important political issue that all educated

citizens

must understand.
* Energy is a key concept in other sciences: chemistry,

biology,

geology, astronomy.
* Energy-related quantities and calculations provide an

outstanding

opportunity to develop students' numeracy skills.
* Energy really is more fundamental than force. While some

particular

forms of energy (gravitational, elastic) are closely related to

force

and are calculated from measured forces, other forms of energy
(thermal, chemical, electrical) are calculated from entirely

different

measurements. Energy in general is a much deeper and broader
concept
than force.

Dan S.



Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:09:47 -0500
From: Dan Crowe <dcrowe@SOTC.ORG>
Subject: Energy is primary and fundamental? (was RE: First

Day

Activities or
Demos)

John,

Some physicists advocate starting a first course in physics

at the

high

school level with energy and energy conservation, but I don't

know

how

to do that.

How do you define energy without reference to force or work?

How can high school students develop an understanding of

energy

and

energy conservation at the beginning of their first course in

physics?


What guidance should a teacher provide in this process?

Daniel Crowe
Oklahoma School of Science and Mathematics
Ardmore Regional Center
dcrowe@sotc.org