Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Phys-L] Re: Energy is primary and fundamental???



I gather you are writing that to be real you must directly experience
it without the use of instruments...so a smack in the nose is real.
What then about Africa, or a hallucination...something you alone
experience. Are electrons real, or atoms?

real is tough,

joe
On Aug 11, 2005, at 12:55 AM, Jim Green wrote:

I find myself wondering what has come over the list. Do we really
want to
debate whether the fellow who smacks you on the nose has applied a
"force"? If there is anything real in his galaxy, that is real.

But "energy"??? For Pete's sake energy is an invention! It certainly
isn't "primary and fundamental" We wander around saying that "light"
is
photons or maybe waves or maybe a beam. Also inventions. Yes photons
got
Einstein a prize, but they are not "real" All these concepts are
useful
-- They help us solve some practical problems.-- but they are not real.

If we try to teach that they are "primary and fundamental," we do our
students a great disservice..

Jim


Jim Green
mailto:JMGreen@sisna.com
http://users.sisna.com/jmgreen


Joseph J. Bellina, Jr. Ph.D.
Professor of Physics
Saint Mary's College
Notre Dame, IN 46556