Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Richard Hake writes:
According to the "What's New" newsletter of 29 Jul 2005 from the
National Academies:
"At two recent Senate hearings, National Academy of Sciences
President Ralph J. Cicerone discussed the current state of scientific
understanding on climate change based largely on findings of recent
studies by the National Academies."
I read Cicerone's testimony, and I have been interested in the///
science and politics of climate change for some years. In my opinion
Cicerone responsibly presents the situation by frequently
intercalating caveats emphasizing the uncertainty of climate
scientists regarding many issues of importance to a government policy
maker. George W. Bush characterized this situation as being too
uncertain to act upon, and did not choose to join the now defunct
Kyoto Treaty. He deserves to be recognized as having made a correct
decision in this matter. I only wish my own government (Canada) had
acted as wisely.
Leigh