Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Phys-L] Re: Sizes of atoms



If the world had only one charge we would have only attraction or
repulsion not both. Unless the sign of the force was position dependent.

bc

Jack Uretsky wrote:

Hi all-
This looks to me like a polarization experiment that only requires
one sign of charge. Am I missing something?
Regards,
Jack


On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Robert Cohen wrote:


On Wednesday, July 06, 2005 8:54 PM, John Denker wrote:


What I'm looking for is a hands-on, compelling demo
that can be done in high school classes (no electron
microscopes, no neutron scattering, etc.) and imparts
a good "feel" for how big atoms are. It's not an
easy question; there were a lot of very smart physicists
who lived pre-1900, and they didn't figure it out.

How good of a "feel" do you want?

I know this doesn't give what you want (an estimate for N)
but how about rubbing a balloon with hair (or whatever) and
having it attract pieces of paper? No perceptible mass
was transferred to/from the balloon yet whatever was
transferred exerted a force larger than the gravitational
force (on the paper).

This doesn't give you a number but to some students this has
more meaning than a number (e.g., Avogadro's or atom radius).

P.S. This also shows that there must be two types of charge
(repulsive and attractive).

____________________________________________________
Robert Cohen; 570-422-3428; www.esu.edu/~bbq
East Stroudsburg University; E. Stroudsburg, PA 18301




--
"Trust me. I have a lot of experience at this."
General Custer's unremembered message to his men,
just before leading them into the Little Big Horn Valley

_______________________________________________
Phys-L mailing list
Phys-L@electron.physics.buffalo.edu
https://www.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l