Re: Cold fusion = Pathological science ???

[Chuck Britton <britton@NCSSM.EDU>]

Earthshaking shaking claims require earthshaking evidence.
Are you saying that such evidence is being suppressed and HAS been
for lo these many years ???

This stand wouldn't be giving the 'physics community' much credit.
Has EVERYONE missed out on the shaking of the earth?

How long was required for 'polywater' to become a lost cause?
or does that research continue as well?

At 3:34 AM -0400 7/17/04, Ludwik Kowalski wrote:
> 1) An interesting piece from Brian Josephson (Nobel prize in 1973 for
> the discovery of a superconducting electronic switch) about
> pseudoscience.
>
> http://www.lindau-nobel.de/images/ock/media/downloads/
> Media_1703187544.htm
>
> It is his lecture at the last annual meeting of Nobel winners in
> Landau, Germany. According to Haiko Lietz, a science reporter who
> attended the gathering:  "the Lindau conference was very interesting,
> as one can imagine. Brian Josephson created a big stir. He spoke
> extensively on cold fusion, and how unscientific attitudes and a
> publication policy prohibited the field from becoming known in the
> scientific community. He was the talk of the day. Many students were
> asking him questions, they were open and interested. Reactions by the
> Nobel laureates were twofold: Some seemed to be surprised that cold
> fusion is still around, while others remained silent."
>
> 2) New items were added at my cold fusion website:
>
> http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/


--
I never teach my pupils; I only attempt to provide the conditions in
which they can learn.
 - Albert Einstein