Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known

[John Denker <jsd@AV8N.COM>]

To learn where these taunts are coming from, check out
Jeremy Batterson's home page:
  http://members.lycos.co.uk/JeremyBatterson/

I quote from
  http://members.lycos.co.uk/JeremyBatterson/kepler2002.html

> In an unusual development, a small group of associates of
> American philosopher and economist Lyndon LaRouche
> demonstrated that what Gauss had called the "complex domain"
> is acting in decisive ways in our solar system, in ways never
> widely considered, since the time of Gauss, himself. They
> offered a devastating demonstration that the orbits and masses
> of the planets could not be arbitrary, but follow some as-yet
> undetermined precise principle. Thus, by the release of their
> findings, they have set off a "race against time," across the
> world, to see who will be the "next Kepler, " namely, who will
> complete this discovery, thus giving the world its first
> newly-discovered astronomical principles since the time of
> Kepler, 400 years ago. Will it be the adherents to the
> Keplerian-Leibnizian-LaRouchian scientific method who complete
> this discovery, or will it be the followers of Newton-Russell,
> and their school? Will it be LaRouche's close followers,
> including his scientific collaborators in such places as
> Russia and Italy, or will it be the stale and boring academic
> farts at such places as the physics departments of Princeton
> and Oxford?