Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: increased range of a remote



I've found a definite improvement in distance when sticking next to chin
versus aiming at the car. Why doesn't the simple act of holding the
remote in your hand cause this "capactivite coupling"? Why does
pressing it to some other part of your body improve the effective range?



"An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a
very narrow field."

- Niels Bohr


-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for Physics Educators [mailto:PHYS-L@lists.nau.edu] On
Behalf Of John Denker
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 1:21 PM
To: PHYS-L@lists.nau.edu
Subject: Re: increased range of a remote

My BS meter is pretty much pegged.

I've seen some big, dense books on antenna design.

When somebody says that you get antenna gain because
of "capacitive coupling", it's equivalent to somebody
saying that a car-engine works because of "force".
What about the other 99.9% of the story??????

Didn't anybody think of controlling for other variables,
such as the fact that on most people, their chin is
_higher_ than their pants-pocket, so that radiation from
that location has a better shot at clearing obstacles?