Re: Internal resistance

[Bernard Cleyet <anngeorg@PACBELL.NET>]

Curious.

I "studied"  Phys.  ~ 35 years => 50 years ago and those are the
definitions I absorbed also.  Definitions change.

bc, who " .... "'d  dynamic in his previous post.

RAUBER, JOEL wrote:

> It wasn't garbled for everyone, I got the message just fine????
>
> Joel
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: Forum for Physics Educators
> | [mailto:PHYS-L@lists.nau.edu] On Behalf Of Dan Crowe
> | Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 8:22 AM
> | To: PHYS-L@lists.nau.edu
> | Subject: FW: Internal resistance
> |
> |
> | [I tried to send this message last night from home
> | using Microsoft Outlook Web Access, but the message
> | that came back through Phys-L was garbled.
> | Sorry about that.]
> |
> | When I studied electrical engineering
> | twenty-some-odd years ago,
> | R = V/I was called "resistance",
> | and r = dv/di was called "dynamic resistance".
> |
> | Daniel Crowe
> | Oklahoma School of Science and Mathematics
> | Ardmore Regional Center
> | dcrowe@sotc.org