Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: visualizing a non-potential



This is really off topic, but:
It just occurred to me that there are cases where the representation of a
CONSERVATIVE E field by continuous lines tangent to the field does not
allow the interpretation of the line density (per unit perpendicular area)
as a proportional measure of the magnitude of E. This occurs inside
continuous charge distributions, where the divergence of E is non-zero.
E.g.: inside an isolated sphere of constant charge density (rho):

E(r) = (rho*r)/(3*epsilon) so that the total "E-flux" piercing an interior
sphere is (4*PI*r^2)*E(r) = (4*PI*rho)/(3*epsilon) * r^3 (just Gauss'
law).
So the E-flux is a function of r and cannot be represented by continuous
lines. To properly represent this flux, the NUMBER of lines must
continuously increase with r, because of the continuous source rho.

Bob Sciamanda (W3NLV)
Physics, Edinboro Univ of PA (em)
trebor@velocity.net
http://www.velocity.net/~trebor


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.459 / Virus Database: 258 - Release Date: 2/25/2003