Re: Lazy?

[Bernard Cleyet <anngeorg@PACBELL.NET>]

"Consider the payroll..."

This is a union issue with which I'm familiar.  In negotiations, the U. bargainers
had difficulty understanding the fact that turnover "freed up" money for raises for
those remaining.

bc member of the team that bargained for two and a half years for the RX (research
professionals) first agreement.

Brian Whatcott wrote:

> I suppose it depends on whether you would rather
> destructively sample the faculty with or without replacement?
> Consider the payroll...
>
> Brian W
>
> At 04:47 PM 10/20/02, Marvin, you wrote:
> > Rather, wouldn't it happen that every year you would replace
> > one-half of the faculty?
> >
> > Mervin Koehlinger
> >
> > Michael D. Edmiston said earlier:
> > > PS: My dean, who is not mathematically inclined, has actually
> > > said we should work toward eliminating all faculty who receive
> > > below-average student evaluations. I pointed out that we
> > > would eventually end up with just one faculty member. He didn't
> > > understand.
>
> Brian Whatcott
>    Altus OK                      Eureka!
>
> This posting is the position of the writer, not that of SUNY-BSC, NAU or the AAPT.

This posting is the position of the writer, not that of SUNY-BSC, NAU or the AAPT.