Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
John Mallinkrodt wrote:
> If there is a vector indicated by <bold>A</bold>_sub_x, then
> <italic>A</italic>_sub_x should formally represent the *magnitude* of
> that vector and, thus, would never have a negative value as it could
> if it instead represented the scalar x-component of the vector
> <bold>A</bold>.
I'm not sure I follow:
let me restate and clarify the notation that I
believe is consistant
(Small note: I'm a proponent of arrows over letters for vector quantities
instead of boldfacing. But I'll follow what you have done above for ASCII
clarity.)
<bold>A</bold> = a vector
<bold>A_x</bold> = a component vector, John D's projection onto
<bold>i_hat</bold>
A_x = a scalar component = <bold>A</bold> dot <bold>i_hat</bold>
|A_x| = a positive scalar, the length of the component vector
<bold>A_x</bold>