Re: Magnetic Monopoles

[Jack Uretsky <jlu@HEP.ANL.GOV>]

I agree with your choice.  What adjustment would they make to Faraday?  Or
why would they adjust Faraday?  Just, "I adjust" needs more thought and
dialogue.

On Thu, 16 May 2002, Tina Fanetti wrote:

> I wouldn't pick that one.  I would pick Gauss's Law for Magnetism bec=
> ause it predicts there are no magnetic monopole.  SOme of my students=
>  think Faraday's Law would need adjusting and I wasn't sure.
>
> Tina Fanetti
> Physics Instructor
> Western Iowa Technical Community College
> 4647 Stone Ave
> Sioux City IA 51102
> 712-274-8733 ext 1429
>
> > > > Jack Uretsky <jlu@HEP.ANL.GOV> 05/16/02 12:27AM >>>
>         At least one of Maxwell's laws would need adjusting.  Why wou=
> ld
> you pick on that one?
>                                 Regards,
>                                         Jack
> On Mon, 13 May 2002, Tina Fanetti wrote:
>
> > If a magnetic monopole were found, would Farady's Law of induction =
> ne=3D
> > ed to be adjusted?
> >
> > Tina
> >
> > Tina Fanetti
> > Physics Instructor
> > Western Iowa Technical Community College
> > 4647 Stone Ave
> > Sioux City IA 51102
> > 712-274-8733 ext 1429
>
> --
> "But as much as I love and respect you, I will beat you and I will ki=
> ll
> you, because that is what I must do.  Tonight it is only you and me, =
> fish.
> It is your strength against my intelligence.  It is a veritable potpo=
> urri
> of metaphor, every nuance of which is fraught with meaning."
>                      Greg Nagan from "The Old Man and the Sea" in
>                      <The 5-MINUTE ILIAD and Other Classics>

--
"But as much as I love and respect you, I will beat you and I will kill
you, because that is what I must do.  Tonight it is only you and me, fish.
It is your strength against my intelligence.  It is a veritable potpourri
of metaphor, every nuance of which is fraught with meaning."
                     Greg Nagan from "The Old Man and the Sea" in
                     <The 5-MINUTE ILIAD and Other Classics>