Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
The origin of my misconception is probably rooted in
the rule according to which "the way in which the flux
changes is not at all important, it can be a stationary B
but changing area, or it can be a constant area but
changing B."
But Faynman argues that two ways of
changing the flux result in two different phenomena.
Right or wrong? I wish I could refer to an experimental
verification of this theoretical claim.
Why are the "two distinct phenomena" not recognized
in our introductary textbooks?
Why don't we have two
distinct names for two distinct phenomena?
How come that both emfs can be
calculated by the same formula? Only a coincidance?