Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
I thought that this thread had petered out.
However, at the risk of being called silly
also, try this one out for size:
According to Newton's second law, f=ma
Transposing, m=f/a
Therefore, if you divide a force on a
car by its acceleration after a stop sign
you CREATE MORE MASS ??
Herb Gottlieb from New York City
(Where mass cannot be created as well as destroyed)
On Sat, 02 Feb 2002 20:44:04 -0800 Bernard Cleyet <anngeorg@PACBELL.NET>
writes:
Do you suggest they take Chem. for the answer to that question?
bc
P.s. Sorry for the late ice ?. I thought I'd exhausted the thread.
Robert Cohen wrote:
I agree a re-wording is in order.(search for
The problem with "cause" has been discussed before on this list
"F=ma" in the list archives). I just know my students would askme "If the
force causes the acceleration, what causes the force?"the word
____________________________________________
Robert Cohen; rcohen@po-box.esu.edu; http://www.esu.edu/~bbq
Physics, East Stroudsburg Univ, E. Stroudsburg, PA 18301
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Horton [mailto:ChrisAHorton2@HOTMAIL.COM]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 7:56 AM
To: PHYS-L@lists.nau.edu
Subject: Re: Car acceleration
One could argue that E is the correct answer: The force of
the foot on the
pedal causes a chain of events with the result that the car
accelerates.
No, I am not just being facetious. The joker in this deck is
being"causes". This word as commonly used (and I don't remember it
number ofredefined in any physics curriculum) does not preclude any
accelerate itintermediate agencies, time delays, etc.
A better wording might be "What force acts on the car to
forward?"
Chris
Herb Gottlieb from New York City
(Where it's nice to live but I wouldn't
want to be a tourist here)
herbgottlieb@juno.com