Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
POSTED TO PHYS-L:
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001
From: Larry Woolf <larry.woolf@GAT.COM>
I am aware of the review of Active Physics in The Physics Teacher (May 1999
issue, pages 284-285) and the article by Philip Sadler and Robert Tai in the
Physics Teacher (May 1997 issue, pages 282-285) on 'The Role of High-School
Physics in Preparing Students for College Physics.'
Therefore, I would like to pose the following questions to the list:
1. Is Active Physics a recommended program for 9th grade?
2. If you have used Active Physics, what was your opinion of the program?
3. Can students who take Active Physics as their first year physics course
succeed in AP physics and do well on the AP test?
4. Do you think students who take high school physics perform better in
college physics than those who do not? Sadler's article states, 'While,on
average, taking a high-school physics course appears to have little
relationship to college physics performance '
5. Is physics in the 9th grade preferred over the more traditional physics
in 11th and 12th grade?
6. In a physics first approach, does the physics course such as Active
Physics coherently support the subsequent chemistry and biology courses and
does the chemistry course coherently support the subsequent biology course?
7. What do university professors think of Active Physics as preparation forI don't know.
college physics?
8. What do you think of the idea of requiring all 9th graders to take Active
Physics? Do you think that math-and-science-oriented students can
successfully take a more traditional physics course in 9th grade?