Re: A question (fwd)

[brian whatcott <inet@INTELLISYS.NET>]

It is in the nature of tilting at windmills that at times
the windmills do not roll over and die. All the same,
remembering a long Indian tradition of advanced maths
I find it better to provide a supportable answer to a question
as asked, rather than using some other assumptions more plausible
 to my modest insights. I thereby hope that some deeper meaning
may become clear over time. What second particular charged geometry
would you assume in answering this question Bob, as a matter
of interest?

Brian

At 10:14 4/11/01 -0400, you wrote:
> Brian,
> If (as I think you are doing) we read the question as asking about a
> universe consisting ONLY of a single charged particle, then I would answer
> that this is a nonsense question. /snip/
> Bob Sciamanda (W3NLV)


> > > From: "Prof. S.D. Agashe" <eesdaia@ee.iitb.ac.in>
> > >
> > > What is(are) the differential equation(s) governing
> > > the "classical" motion of a single charged body?
> > >
> > > S D Agashe
> >
> >
> > The quixotic answer is that the three orthogonal components
> > of velocity would be constant, and acceleration would be zero
/snip/

brian whatcott <inet@intellisys.net>  Altus OK
                Eureka!