Chronology |
Current Month |
Current Thread |
Current Date |

[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |

*From*: "John S. Denker" <jsd@MONMOUTH.COM>*Date*: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 20:50:37 -0500

At 08:26 PM 2/28/01 -0500, Ludwik Kowalski wrote:

I would know how to calculate C of the funny capacitor, at

least in principle, if the potential of the bottom plate were

specified,

Good.

for example zero.

Not a good choice.

In that case I would impose

potentials on vertical plates, for example, -50 and +50 V,

and used the Laplace equation to find surface charges

on each vertical plate. Then C=Q/V.

Q = C V where C is the 3x3 capacitance matrix.

You can walk through the columns by changing the imposed

voltage on each of the elements.

The boundary

conditions (potentials on three objects) is given and the

rest is just a matter of number crunching.

Yes. There exist many ways to do the crunching, including the spreadsheets

discussed in this connection last month.

> But how can the problem be solved when the lower plate is

floating.

V = C^-1 Q, for imposed Q.

Inverting a 3x3 matrix isn't very hard. A fellow named Gauss had something

to say about it.

- Prev by Date:
**Re: A funny capacitor.** - Next by Date:
**Re: Measurement units of light** - Previous by thread:
**Re: A funny capacitor.** - Next by thread:
**Review of Middle School Physical Science Texts (part 4)** - Index(es):