|Chronology||Current Month||Current Thread||Current Date|
|[Year List] [Month List (current year)]||[Date Index] [Thread Index]||[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]||[Date Prev] [Date Next]|
The correl that I've purchased has been pretty inexpensive. I don't seewhy
it would be cheaper if Corning were paying royalties to the government for
each piece produced. They do pay tax on any profit they make from sales.
Bob and Kathie Yeend <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: "Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese" <georgeann@REDSHIFT.COM>
Subject: Re: Moon landing Hoax (spinoffs)
Date: Fri, Feb 23, 2001, 7:19 PM
How many billion $ for how many dishes Their actual cost $100 each?
P.s. I've never heard of it. We use Pyrex -- probably not a govt.
P.p.s. This is another example of socialism for the corporations and
capitalism for the poor. The corps. get the patents free from tax
supported research, and we pay at inflated prices to buy the results.
Tim O'Donnell wrote:
Surely the cost, spin off ratio is very high. Would not a
direct "attack" on the "spin-offs" have yielded results less
expensively and more rapidly?
But the spin-offs may not have been researched.
Corning came up with "correl ware" as a possible heat
sheilding. It did not work out for that, but I have alot of
correl plate and bowls. I don't think Corning would have
activiely searched for a new material to make dishware.
Instructor of Physics and Chemistry
Celina High School
715 East Wayne Street
Celina, Ohio 45822
(419) 586-8300 Ext 1200 or 1201
"Chance only favors the prepared mind." - Louis Pasteur