Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Planck mass



Thanks - I had never heard it related to the Black
Hole thing but that seems to be the way to get the G to make 'sense'.


At 4:21 PM -0500 1/18/01, David Bowman, you wrote about Re: Planck
mass = big for a subatomic particle, but sma:



It's the value of sqrt(h-bar*c/G) and is numerically about
2.1767(16) x 10^(-8) kg

This is big for a subatomic particle, but small for a black hole.

David Bowman
David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu

-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-
\ / \ / \ N / \ C / \ S / \ S / \ M / \ / \ /
`-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-'
Chuck Britton Education is what is left when
britton@ncssm.edu you have forgotten everything
North Carolina School of Science & Math you learned in school.
(919) 286-3366 x224 Albert Einstein, 1936