Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
The other day, I was reading in some old science book about flight. Icame
across an example I was a little confused with. The example was how aspinning
ball was able to generate "lift" by giving it a backspin, in which I haveball in
observed while playing volleyball or basketball. They authors gave an
explanation that it was due to the relative velocity of the top of the
respect to the bottom of the ball.decreases,
I understand that as the velocity of air increases, the pressure
which ultimately leads to "lift". If a ball is thrown with no spin, theof the
relative velocity of the air on top of the ball is the same as the bottom
ball (Right now, I'm neglecting vortexes that form around the ball). If aball
has a backspin, isn't the bottom of the ball have a higher relativevelocity to
the air? The way I picture it, it would be like someone in a cartraveling
50mph and throwing a ball 30mph ahead of him (with respect to the driver).The
relative velocity of the ball to a "stationary" person would be 80mph.have a
Since the bottom of the ball is spinning into the wind, wouldn't it
higher relative velocity in comparison to the top of the ball? I'm justcurious
how does a backspinning ball "float" while a forward spinning ball"dives".
Dwight
Ashland, OH