Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Transfering an Electrical Concept



Good shot, Chuck!
Exactly this approach is exploited in standard texts on "Acoustics" (eg:
Kinsler & Frey).

Bob

Bob Sciamanda (W3NLV)
Physics, Edinboro Univ of PA (em)
trebor@velocity.net
http://www.velocity.net/~trebor

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Britton" <britton@NCSSM.EDU>
To: <PHYS-L@lists.nau.edu>
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 05:44 PM
Subject: Re: Transfering an Electrical Concept


At 10:51 AM -0600 12/17/00, brian whatcott, you wrote about
Transfering an Electrical Concept - matching mechanical:


The maximum power theorem is well known to electrical engineers.
It may be expressed like this:
Maximal power is transfered when the source impedance equals
the characteristic impedance of the output.


What is a reasonable explanation for the need to choose an optimal
bolt mass in a crossbow for best range?
Impulse? Change of momentum?

I had thought a bit along these lines several years ago when some
students were designing a trebouchet but did not finalize anything.

Using the analogy to the electrical case where P = IV , mechanics has
P = F x v (velocity)

Electrical impedance is V/I so I suggest that mechanical 'impedance'
is F / v = m (a/v).

I dunno if this has ANY validity, but since nobody else dove in, I
decided to speak up.

further comments would be MOST welcome.

-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-.
.-
\ / \ / \ N / \ C / \ S / \ S / \ M / \ / \
/
`-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-'
`-'
Chuck Britton Education is what is
left when
britton@ncssm.edu you have forgotten
everything
North Carolina School of Science & Math you learned in school.
(919) 286-3366 x224 Albert Einstein,
1936