Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
I guess I would worry about teaching physics in the context of
engineering. There is the general philosophical issue of
what one does
when one teachs and learns physics. If you do it to solve a
problem and
get a number...then I suppose you are correct. But if you do it to
understand a way of thinking about the world and how objects interact
with each other, then I think the engineering context is not the
place. I am, as some of you know, inclined to the latter.
Class. IE "tools"1) Mathematicians do not consider The Calculus to be a real
math course yet
they try to guard it as their domain -- only the pixies know why.
<g> Ideally Calculus should be taught in a Physics
engineeringshould be taught in an ambient where the tools are used.
Which is why physics should be taught just-in-time in the
courses!!! Thus eliminating introductory physics from thecurriculum. (or
so it is argued by many)
Joel Rauber
Joel_Rauber@sdstate.edu