Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
ofIs there a convincing evidence (from our Physics Education
Research groups, or from anybody else) that under identical
and realistic conditions computer-based labs are more effective
than traditional labs in physics? I never saw one.
Sure. Bob Beichner of NCSU has given a number of talks about his
work with the SCALE-UP class there. At one point he was in a position
teaching one section of traditional physics, doing the best he could inthat
format, and also another section where he was free to use all the newteaching
tools he could, including MBL. The students in his traditional classdidn't
do nearly as well as his research-based class by multiple measures. Wasit the
MBL that made the difference?
Yes, a gifted teacher will do better regardless of the situation.
Even teachers who get rave reviews and win
teaching awards don't do very well at all if all they do is lecture.
A computer is not the only way to engage students in
what they are doing, but it is one possible way that has been shown to
work well.
John E. Gastineau