Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Haven't we had this discussion before? Still, I might as well speak up.
I agree with Rick:
Rick Tarara says:
There seems to be enough gender differences in learning
styles that we need to be concerned with instructional techniques that are
too narrowly aimed at particular styles which may put either women or men at
a disadvantage. So the gender issues are not in the Physics, but in the
doing and teaching of physics.
And I am interested in reading the book Dewey has suggested, but I am
particularly caught by Jim Green's statement:
Jim Green Says:
"Anti-promoting"??? I don't see any physics instructor standing in front
of her/his class and saying "Folks, physics is a lousy field to be majoring
in, try the law, or maybe engineering" Of course if a male instructor
said something like "Ladies, physics is a male field; stay away, he would
be fired and maybe sued. If a female instructor said this, that would be
ok, but I can't see a female physicist saying this to female students. I
don't know what would happen if a chemistry instructor said the likes of
this. <g>
What "anti-promoting"?
I know a female physicist who told me and a friend of mine NOT to get a
PhD in physics, that it wasn't "worth it." Granted, that was just after
she had finished defending her dissertation, or whatever it was that she
was supposed to do to obtain the degree. However, she loves physics. I
love physics, and I know other women who love physics. But I do not want
a PhD in it, nor do I want to get one. Is it because a particular person
"anti-promoted" physics to me? No. It is the system and process. I like
having a social life, for one thing.