Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Internal or external?



Brian McInnes wrote:

Here follows a "minor" point that I find irritating.

In the recent thread on treatment of Atwood type situations phrases
such as "each mass is acted upon by two forces" occurred from time to
time. I think that we shouldn't confuse the property "mass" with the
name of the object. I'd call it "object" or "body" or (better)
"block" but not "mass" or even "weight".

At 6:37 AM -0400 10/10/1999, Ludwik Kowalski wrote:
That is easy to fix. On the other hand, what harm can result
from using the common shortcut, "force acting on a mass"?

I quote from NIST's "Guide for the use of the International System of Units
(SI)," page 22:

----begin quote-------
To avoid confusion, when discussing quantities or reporting their values,
one should distinguish between a phenomenon, body, or substance, and an
attribute ascribed to it. For example, one should recognize the difference
between a body and its mass, a surface and its area, a capacitor and its
capacitance, and a coil and its inductance. This means that although it is
acceptable to say "an object of mass 1 kg was attached to a string to form
a pendulum," it is not acceptable to say "a mass of 1 kg was attached to a
string to form a pendulum."
-----end quote------

Cheers,
Larry


Larry K. Smith voice: (435) 283-7520 | Not everything that counts
Dept. of Physics fax: (435) 283-7501 | can be counted; and not
Snow College mailto:Larry.Smith@snow.edu | everything that can be
150 College Ave. http://www.snow.edu/~larrys | counted counts.
Ephraim, UT 84627 USA | Albert Einstein