Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
And this is what I find in the papers cited by R. Ebert. Each one of them
is
very careful and they do not establish that Santos' objections are solved.
in the case of LHV models, this, in fact, is being done with experiments
already carried out or proposed which will address most if not all of
Santos' objections.
Just
a few examples to see:
P. Kwiat et al., Phys. Rev. A 49, 3209 (1994) say in page 3215: "A
loophole-free
experiment still seems feasible, although detectors need to be improved
somewhat.", and the title of the paper say PROPOSAL FOR ...
On the other hand the arguments against these approchs is maintained.
See for example:
Physics Letters A 10 (1996)
Optical Soc. Amer B, 15, 1572 (1998)
Found.Phys. 27, 765 (1997).