Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

IONS/forces



On 10/7/98 Bob Sciamanda wrote:

... A conductor, either carrying a net non-zero charge and/or
within the influence of external charges, IS ALWAYS IN
TENSION due to electrostatic fields acting on its surface
charges, never in compression. That is: wherever there is
a non-neutral surface charge, those charges are being forced
OUTWARD by the combined electric force of the rest of the
conductor and the rest of the universe. You can in fact (using
Gauss' law) get quantitative: F/A =1/2 (sigma/eps) - the force
per unit area is equal to 1/2 the surface charge density/epsilon).

This is what classical E&M concludes to be the bottom line, net
effect - existing electric forces are trying to rip any excess charges
straight out from the conductor surface (there is no escape from
this conclusion - don't spin your wheels!). Why don't the
charges move? Classical E&M responds only that there is no
conductivity in that direction. The mechanism behind this
"blocking" non-conductivity is not addressed.

By unspoken hypothesis, no mechanism is required: Classical
E&M is here taking non-conductivity as a presumed given -
unless you move along or into a conductor! (You presume
that motion can occur unless there is a blocking force; in
contrast, this model presumes that motion is forbidden
unless there is conductivity.) .....

Everybody knows how to calculate a repulsive force
between two identical point charges, Q/2, separated by
a distance r. For example, F=22.5 N when Q=0.001 mC
(r=1 cm), 2250 N when Q=0.01 mC, etc.

Suppose that a charge Q=0.001 mC is distributed
uniformly over the INNER surface of a DIELECTRIC
spherical shell whose radius is 1 cm. Then, if thinking
in terms of forces is not forbidden, the pressure exerted
on the shell is 0.24 atm (it would become 240000 atm
if the net charge were 1 mC; electrostatic pressure is
proportional to the square of Q).

1) Clearly a thin shell (of r= cm) would burst under
the electric pressure of one millicoulmb. How thick
should the shell be to hold 1 mC? Suppose that the
mechanical properties of the material are the same
as for steel. I do not know how to find the necessary
thickness d when the gas pressure is given. Can
somebody suggest a clerver way of estimating d? Or
summarize a ready-made recipe?

2) Suppose that the dielectric shell is very thin and
supported (to prevent bursting) by a very thick
metallic shell. Induced charges on the inner surface
of the metallic shell will at once remove the electric
pressure and the charge Q will appear on the outer
metallic surface. Now Pauli is in charge of all charges.
Like charges still repel but they are not free to escape
into a vacuum, unless E is excessive (for example,
10^9 V/m or so).

Thick dielectric=closed jail.
Metal=open jail, and a tunnel to escape.
Ludwik Kowalski