Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
... A conductor, either carrying a net non-zero charge and/or
within the influence of external charges, IS ALWAYS IN
TENSION due to electrostatic fields acting on its surface
charges, never in compression. That is: wherever there is
a non-neutral surface charge, those charges are being forced
OUTWARD by the combined electric force of the rest of the
conductor and the rest of the universe. You can in fact (using
Gauss' law) get quantitative: F/A =1/2 (sigma/eps) - the force
per unit area is equal to 1/2 the surface charge density/epsilon).
This is what classical E&M concludes to be the bottom line, net
effect - existing electric forces are trying to rip any excess charges
straight out from the conductor surface (there is no escape from
this conclusion - don't spin your wheels!). Why don't the
charges move? Classical E&M responds only that there is no
conductivity in that direction. The mechanism behind this
"blocking" non-conductivity is not addressed.
By unspoken hypothesis, no mechanism is required: Classical
E&M is here taking non-conductivity as a presumed given -
unless you move along or into a conductor! (You presume
that motion can occur unless there is a blocking force; in
contrast, this model presumes that motion is forbidden
unless there is conductivity.) .....