Re:Time

[brian whatcott <inet@intellisys.net>]

At 07:39 10/26/98 +0500, you wrote:
> Without events occuring there can be no meaning for the concept of time.
> Events are changes in environment. Changes in environment are produced
> by motion of objects in environment. If there is motion there is no time.
> When motion is more fundamental than time, how is it we take time to be
> a fundamental quantity and describe motion in terms of time?
>
> regards,
>
> sarma.
If a sensible object is first here and then there, this does not constitute
motion. But still there is a sequence of events in time.
I arrange a timer to beam a laser diode on a wall, then a second, then a
third each pointing at a different place. 
Is there not stillness? But time is still associated with each event.
 I say motion is not more fundamental.

Regards

brian whatcott <inet@intellisys.net>
Altus OK