Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 07:33:03 -0500 (CDT)
Reply-to: phys-l@mailer.uwf.edu
From: Tim Burgess <tburgess@jaguar1.usouthal.edu>
To: phys-l@atlantis.uwf.edu
Cc: phys-l@atlantis.uwf.edu
Subject: Work done by Friction
Hi!Wouldn't it be nice if we could handle all of these cases
I'm with a group of high school physics teachers. We are
in disarray.
Textbooks that we use commonly refer to the "work done by
friction"
in slowing the speed of objects. There are some who
think this approach is flawed. Others indicate that the
right answer is commonly obtained by treating such
friction as work.
Some would just ignore the textbook treatment and
indicate that
"work done by friction" is not the way to address the
energy "dissipated".
There are strong opinions present here. What is the
thoughts of
those of you on this list?
Tim