Chronology
Current Month
Current Thread
Current Date
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
[
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
[
Thread Prev
] [
Thread Next
]
[
Date Prev
] [
Date Next
]
Re: apparent weight
From
: "William J. Larson" <
Bill_Larson@compuserve.com
>
Date
: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 04:40:57 -0500
Message text written by INTERNET:phys-l@atlantis.uwf.edu
In my opinion, no harm can result from explaining =
certain things in terms of *centrifugal* forces, magnetic *poles*, light =
*rays*, etc. Yes, I am sticking out my neck again. Later courses, if any,=
=
may elaborate on limited utility of simple explanations and deal with =
hidden nuances. <
Wow ... another physics teach believes this! I'm not alone.
Thanks,
Bill Larson
Geneva
Prev by Date:
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology
Next by Date:
Re: Solar eclipse (not)
Previous by thread:
Re: apparent weight
Next by thread:
Re: apparent weight
Index(es):
Date
Thread