Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
I imagine these hypothetical conversations between media people (M), NASApr
people (NPR), and physicists (P) in isolated instances.weighed a
After a TV broadcast of a launch in the sixties.
M1: That guy's floating.
M2: Yeah, it's as if he doesn't weigh anything.
Light bulb flickers over M1's head.
M1: Yeah, weightless.
After reading and watching the media's characterization of the event:
NPR1: So how do we deal with this weightless thing?
NPR2: The public seems to have accepted the idea?
NPR1: Yeah, but . . .
NPR2: Let the physics teachers handle it.
P1: So, how are you going to explain the weightless thing?
P2: Talk about bathroom scales in elevators and call it true weight and
apparent weight.
P1: Why not just call the force the scale applies to the mass being
normal force?have
P2: That's too easy. The students will never believe us. Besides, we
to explain it in terminology that the public uses.Links?
A computer programmer overhearing this conversation shakes her head and
mumbles: Use terminology the public uses? Windows? Mouse? Buttons?