Chronology
Current Month
Current Thread
Current Date
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
[
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
[
Thread Prev
] [
Thread Next
]
[
Date Prev
] [
Date Next
]
Re: Apparent weight
From
:
Raacc@aol.com
Date
: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 14:19:55 EST
In a message dated 98-02-14 13:35:36 EST, you write:
<< Once our students get this separation of weight from the mg force, then
they are far more successful with solving dynamics and statics problems. >>
This is surprising since most texts I've used define weight as mg. I've just
looked through these texts that all define W = mg.
Physics, Resnick/Halliday/Krane
Physics for Scientists and Engineers, Tipler
Fundamentals of Physics, Halliday/Resnick/Walker
Engineering Mechanics Statics, Hibbeler
Vector Mechanics for Engineers Statics, Beer/Johnston
Physics for Scientists and Engineers, Serway
What texts define it differently and therefore make statics and dynamics
problem solving easier?
Bob Carlson
Prev by Date:
Re: Apparent weight
Next by Date:
Re: Apparent weight
Previous by thread:
Re: Apparent weight
Next by thread:
Re: Apparent weight
Index(es):
Date
Thread