Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Memorization and terminal physics course



Recently, several people contributed personal antecdotes and philosophies
regarding the utility of shallow learning (my term) in their early physics
classes, as this facilitated deeper learning upon revisitating the same topics
in later classes and life experiences. I agree that this can be a very useful
process for those students who will be revisiting, in a formal way, the topics
covered in first courses in physics. This, I gathered, was the point of the
original posts.

I would like to add that this same idea is a strong argument for applying the
"less is more" philosophy to classes for non-physics majors. Specifically, it
argues for a de-emphasis of the memorization required by the chapter-per-week-
of-the-physics-encyclopedia approach, and argues for conceptual change
approaches in such classes. If the students in a class most likely will never
again encounter the material in a classroom, it would be best to give
them the time to go through the assimilation process, so that they might be
able to recognize and apply the concepts when encountered in life.

Which conceptual developments do you consider the most likely candidates
for inclusion in such a course? I think you will find that if you assemble
a random chosen committee with more than two members you will get enough
topics to overfill any course. I certainly would not leave thermodynamics
out of a course intended to be applied to the students' real lives. When
that is included and developed in some depth you won't find a lot of room
left for anything else.

I think that building a course on the criterion of applicability of
concepts to "life" is wrong-headed. Why would one teach physics to, say,
musicians in this manner? Would you also advocate teaching music to
physicists with the same selection criteria? I know that I would not want
to take such a course in music; I want to know what musicians think is
neat stuff. In a similar vein I don't think that a musician would like to
see relativity, black holes, and elementary particles left out of her
curriculum even though she will likely never encounter them in life.

Leigh