Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Friction



On November 1, 1996 Dwight Souder wrote:
Greetings everyone. The other day, I was talking to our school's
tutor. We were talking about what I was going over in Physics when he saw
something in my notes. I copied a quote from the Modern Physics by Trinklein
(Holt publishing) on p. 81 in the section dealing with Friction. The quote
states that, "Friction is practically independent of the area of contact. The
force needed to slide a block along a table is almost the same whether the
block lies on its side or on its end. When the block is on its end, the
increased pressure causes the actual area of contact to be the same as when
the block is on its side." To me, this seems very logical and I've
tested/demonstrated this many times. One of the teachers asked a question
that really made me think. He wanted to know if the above statement is true,
then why do race car/drag racers use wide tires? If the above statement is
correct, then wouldn't be possible to use narrower tires and get the same
effect? Also, apparently race car drivers use "slicks" (tires with no tread)
to try to optimize the "grip" with the road. Does it really matter if there
is tread on a tire on dry road?
If you have any information that you can give me, I'd greatly
appreciate it! I'm not very knowledgeable of race/drag cars, so the above
information may be slightly incorrect dealing with the tires.

Dwight
dsauder@nwosun.discovery.k12.oh.us

Just the drive the point home about what is meant by "contact area..."
A distinction must be made in this demonstration between apparent
(or nominal) area and the so called 'real contact area." In the 1950s,
Bowden and Tabor conducted a now famous study of slightly polished steel
flats in contact under various applied loads. They measured the real area
of contact via electrical conductance. I don't have the results in front
of me, but I'll do my best to recall the details. The "loads" varied from
5 g to 500 kg; and the number of contacts varied from 3 to 35,
respectively. The average contact radius (assuming the contact is
circular) is on the order of 10 micrometers. The ratio of real contact
area to the nominal contact area is on the order of 1/1000.