Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Moseley's Plot and equation





On 5 Apr 1996, ken fox wrote:

Again I come for help.

The IB Higher level curriculum expects a qualitative understanding of
Moseley's equation that states:

sqrt f = a(Z-b).

The plot is interesting and its historical value is clear. For the K series
b=1 as photons are emited when L or M electrons fall to fill the hole left in
the K shell. b =1, my reference(Tipler's Modern Physics) tells me as the one
remaining electron in the K shell seems to "screen" the nucleus so that a
nucleus Z acts as if it were Z - 1. I think (hope) I understand that.

I ran into trouble by letting my mouth point out that for the L series, where
the L shell is temporarily lacking an electron, the the value of b = 7.4.
This value is apparently determined from his plot. One of my brighter
students,Ben, who hopes to pursue theoretical Physics, argures that by the
earlier reasoning, the value shouldbe at least 9. He argued it should exceed
9 but I could not follow his logic.

I have never taught this part of Physics before and am insecure as the
dickens. I am enjoying trying to learn it but.... Can anyone help me out
with a reply forBen?

Thanks in advance.

Ken Fox
Smoky Hill High School
16100 Smoky Hill Rd.
Aurora, CO. 80015
303-693-1700
ken_fox@shhs1.ccsd.k12.co.us

Unfortunately, life is never quite as simple as we would like. If we were
to assume that in the L-case we would have the two K electrons near the
nucleus and also the seven L electrons left when the vacany was created we
would have (Z-9). This is where the figure of nine comes from. The L
shell electrons do not all have spherially symmetric probability
distributions, and may not be inside the orbit of the approaching electron
which will fill the vacancy. For all these reasons the count electrons
approach doesn't work any more. Although I don't know what current
theory and experiment gives, I would expect 7.4 would not be far off.

Barlow Newbolt
Washington and Lee