Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
As for telescopes:
Nowadays you're more likely to see a buggy whip or a medicinal
leech than you are to see an astronomer looking through the
eyepiece of a telescope. For professionals, and even for serious
amateurs, it's all CCDs.
As a side benefit, a whole class can look at the CCD image
at once (rather than taking turns at the eyepiece).
May be true but there is a large segment of the population that does not
believe “scientific" images are real. By using a simple optical system
where the observer can see there is nothing but glass in the eye path the
argument that something inside the black box (electronics?) caused the
image is moot. And it says one doesn’t always need state of the art
equipment to observe neat stuff. It is all part of making science
believable through simplicity. Once one believes, well yes, then go on to
ccds and whatever.
It is also known that displaying work done by others does not capture a
person’s interest as much as if they do it themselves. By having a person
actually look through a telescope and see the object they become a lot more
interested in what that object is about because the object is part of their
experience. Once they have seen the image for themselves, then by all means
go on to the displaying and analysis of images. Otherwise, for many, it is
just entertainment and the learning aspect is lost.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l