Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-L] political yes, partisan no



OK! I agree, except in this case it’s very partisan.

So thinks bc.


Also, corporate politics and university politics are intensely political,


I remember W. Wilson saying Princeton politics, much worse than Federal. (Same, more intelligent combatants)


On 2017/Mar/04, at 19:05, John Denker via Phys-l <phys-l@mail.phys-l.org> wrote:

On 03/04/2017 07:54 PM, bernard cleyet wrote:

becoming rather partisan

That is not the right way to think about it.
-- I oppose anybody who is doing the wrong thing, regardless of party.
-- I support anybody who is doing the right thing, regardless of party.

The last time I got mixed up in a political fight, my side won on a
unanimous vote. It was intensely political, but the efforts and the
results were bipartisan.

Also, corporate politics and university politics are intensely political,
but not partisan in the usual sense. Lots of shifting alliances.

If somebody wants to make science or truth or integrity or good governance
a partisan issue, I'll fight him on that, because it's the wrong thing to do.

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l