Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo



For the first time this Fall, I'm teaching a class in "How Things Work" to a group of non-science majors. This, I have never done before, and it's a bit daunting to know that I need to connect to them in a different way from STEM majors.

At any rate, we're using the book How Things Work, by Bloomfield, and he explains that the dishes remain on the table when you whisk a tablecloth from under them "because of inertia." He expands only slightly, and I do get what he's saying, but I feel like this isn't the best way to try to get Newton's First Law across. This "experiment" depends sensitively on factors such as the acceleration of the tablecloth, and the static and kinetic coefficients of friction. If you use a looong tablecloth you will probably get in trouble. To the contrary, it seems that friction is one of the reasons that people don't really get the First Law: "objects in motion stay in motion" but virtually everything that you slide across a table doesn't do this. Isn't this regarded as one of the reasons that the force-and-motion connection became so ingrained?

Like I said, I do understand how one could use this demo to discuss the first law, but it seems to me that a glider on an air track or a puck on an air table are more instructive given a finite class time. What does everyone think?



Stefan Jeglinski