Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-L] how research is done : exploring a maze using only local information



John
I ran the maze for a while, but decided I don’t agree that it is a good model for research unless of course I am missing something. There are two observations that can be made about the process of doing science. One is that all theories are underdetermined, and the other is that all experiments are theory laden. It is the latter that provides the flaw in your model in the sense that, unless as I said I missed it, there is no underlying theory to guide my decisions, good or bad, it is rather a random walk, which I don’t think is really how science is done.

Have I missed something?

best,

joe
Joseph J. Bellina, Jr. Ph.D.
Retired Professor of Physics
Co-Director, Northern Indiana Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Collaborative (NISMEC)
Consultant I-STEM Network
574-276-8294
inquirybellina@comcast.net




On Sep 13, 2015, at 7:48 PM, John Denker <jsd@AV8N.COM> wrote:

On 08/31/2015 06:23 PM, I wrote:

it should be
possible to get it to run as a web-browser app, but that's
more work than I feel like doing at the moment.

Well, it was about 200 times harder than it should have been,
but I got the maze-exploration program to run interactively
in the browser.

http://www.av8n.com/physics/glorpy-maze.html

This is a metaphor for how scientific research is done. Even if
you explore the maze as wisely and efficiently as possible, you
will spend a goodly amount of time exploring dead ends. This does
not mean that you made a bad decision, or made a mistake. It's
just part of the cost of doing business. See
http://www.av8n.com/physics/research-maze.htm
for further discussion.

In absolute terms, the students who sign up for the physics
class are not completely afraid of a challenge, not completely
averse to risk. Otherwise they would have chosen an easier
course.

However, in relative terms, relative to the professionals on this
list, and relative to where they ought to be by the end of the
course, they are waaaaaay too risk-averse. They think that
making a wrong turn is Wrong with a capital W, in the same way
that stealing is Wrong. For years and years, they have been
trained that they should know the outcome before starting the
so-called «experiment». The idea of doing a real experiment
to *find out* the answer is foreign to them. Exploring a maze
is a nice way to give them experience with the idea that backing
out of blind alleys is part of the cost of doing business.

When doing research, you do not get to see an overview of the
maze. If you want to see what the maze looks like, you have to
earn that information by exploring. You don't know where the
cheese is, and you don't even know what it looks like ... and
you won't know until you find it.

Accordingly, my maze app does not give you an overview of
the maze. This makes solving it noticeably harder, and
noticeably more of an adventure.

The app has been tested under Firefox and Chrome on Linux.
It should be reasonably portable, although it is not expected
to work on smartphones or other touchscreen devices. The
whole point of making it run in the browser was to make it
convenient and portable.

See also next message.

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@www.phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l