Re: [Phys-L] No big bang theory ...

[Marty Weiss <martweiss@comcast.net>]

What did you just say?  translation please. 

On Feb 20, 2015, at 12:20 PM, brian whatcott wrote:

> An innocent naturally rejoices at the elimination of weasel-worded explanations of super-luminal expansion involved in the current creation myth - and nods at the conjunction of  gravity and quantum theory.
> Still, one  havers uneasily on the merits: knowing that too much expertise in the paradigm stifles creativity - yet registering that the authors are not from hot-bed centers of theories of everything.
>
> Brian Whatcott
>
> On 2/20/2015 12:24 AM, rjensen@ualberta.ca wrote:
> > An interesting development:
> >
> > Intro
> > http://metronews.ca/news/calgary/1292682/there-was-no-big-bang-lethbridge-academics-paper-turning-cosmology-on-its-head/
> >
> > Article
> > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269314009381
> >  Dr. Roy Jensen
> > (==========)-----------------------------------------¤
> >  Lecturer, Chemistry
> >  E5-33F, University of Alberta
> >  780.248.1808
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@www.phys-l.org
> http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l