Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-L] widget rate puzzle ... reasoning, scaling, et cetera



I have found that smaller classes sometimes makes student voices more singular. When ive had classes with under 15 kids, sometimes one students voice will lead the others, even if they dont necessarily agree. When you only have 4, you only have 4. There certainly are kids like that, but we also have kids that want to talk about relativity, black holes, *how* their touchscreen devices work, and so on. In fact, the /make/ movement is going strong. We have lots of kids figuring out cad software so they can print things, lots of kids trying to learn programming, and some kids trying to make stuff with arduino controllers. I think the future is bright for physics, science, and technical education. Our targets continue to evolve, challenges are always present, but we have more tools than ever. Politics aside, I think we are in a bit of a golden age of opportunity.




Sent from Samsung tablet



-------- Original message --------
From: Marty Weiss <martweiss@comcast.net>
Date: 01/01/2015 5:13 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: Phys-L@Phys-L.org
Subject: Re: [Phys-L] widget rate puzzle ... reasoning, scaling, et cetera


The state of modern youth.

Last week I was teaching right hand rules and we got to the topic of magnetic fields and motors. This is a small class in a small private school of 30 total enrollment in the school and the so-called physics class has four students (yes that's right... four teenage boys.) Three of the boys have never played with a motor and never even tore a battery apart to see what it made it "tick". I said when I was their age we got our hands dirty tearing things apart; mixing chemicals in the basement with our Gilbert chemistry sets; building cranes and ferris wheels with our erector sets. . They laughed and said, "Mr. Weiss... you grew up in the olden days." It wasn't always like this... A few years back one boy had brought in a huge motor he ripped from an old broken upright freezer and we spend days exploring it and getting really dirty along the way. I mentioned it to these three boys and do you know what they said? "That kid was a nerd." A nerd? For getting down and dirty and l
oving to do something with his hands and learning how things work? In fact, one boy in this current class showed me his iPhone and said, "This is our world. I don't need to know how motors work. All I have to know is how to get things done on this." This is supposed to be a physics class? If they didn't have to take physics I'm sure they would rather take a free period, search on Twitter or Facebook and while away the time watching funny antics of cats and dogs performing tricks.


On Jan 1, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Anthony Lapinski wrote:

I, like most teachers on this list, like these simple thinking problems.
Most students, at least the ones I teach, don't. They can't/don't think
like we do. They don't really care about these ratio/scaling problems
as they find them irrelevant. They feel the same way about most of
what they learn in math classes. In physics, they just want a formula
to solve a problem. Their critical thinking skills are generally poor,
mainly because they are not taught how to critically think in high
school. What courses do this, besides physics? And with all the new
handheld devices these days, students are weaker at fixing things
and solving real problems. However, they can text very efficiently! Sad...
I assume others on this list feel the same way.

I also like the question about making the sides of a square and triangle
two times longer. I might incorporate some of these into my "placement"
survey I give each year to assess kids' thinking skills and whether they
are in
the right physics class (honors or regular).

When I teach electricity, I give each student a battery, bulb, and wire
and ask them to make it light. Most can't initially. I tell them not to
look at their neighbors and what they are doing. I eventually give them
some hints, and they all eventually get it. It's a good thinking activity
for kids
at any level (regular, honors, even middle school). I then show the Harvard
video clip, where the graduates can't do this simple task. These are
"smart"
kids ("engineers") who don't know the basics of electricity. Maybe they
were
never taught?



_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@www.phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l