Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
|
|As to problem solving we know quite well that students can be pretty
|good problem solvers while at the same time they lack the concepts.
|The really superb problem solvers have to use the concepts.
I've always wondered about the above statement (in its
various guises). I suspect the validity of it hinges
critically upon the "problems". Are you asking problems that
allow for rote-algorithmic responses for success? If so,
then I believe it. (These would be the traditional plug and
chug variety; often substitute into a single appropriately
chosen equation; then I believe it.
OTOH, if the problems require understanding the concepts to
answer, than I don't believe it; and one can write this style
of problem. For example, a problem requiring a derivation
(not memorized from the text) (but eminently doable, if one
understands the concepts and has a reasonable subset or the
prerequisite math skills.). Often a 2-3 step (concept)
equation hunting problem can serve the purpose as well or
even derivations from the text; then I'm not sure my
experience matches up with the above statement.
|So problem solving is not a
|good test. If you want to combine the two use the MBT. Actually
|students want to memorize procedures for problem solving and that is
|what happens in the conventional classes.
|
Joel R.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l