Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming as if it had already
And I, in turn, wonder what those who so smugly treat the overwhelming
warming turns out to be wrong it will be one of the few times that modern
IMO, if the overwhelming scientific consensus on anthropogenic global
politicians and
John Mallinckrodt
Cal Poly Pomona
On Dec 31, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Ze'ev Wurman wrote:
It was a perfectly nice thread until John "Know-It-All" Clement chose to
climb on his beloved wooden pony yet again.
On 12/31/2013 9:05 AM, John Clement wrote:
In the US both evolution and global warming are fields where
latestreligious leaders are not engaging in critical thinking. (see the
commonPEW survey) They are ignoring the professionals in science and using
everyday thinking which is often not critical.
The proximity of "evolution" and "global warming" that so predictably
and so uncritically roll off his tongue make me (critically?) wonder
what will happen if/when global warming will be shown not to be
man-caused, or even possibly non-existent. Will John the-pony-rider
start separating evolution and global warming then, or will he stop
believing in evolution too? Critical minds want to know.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l