Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
-----Original Message-----
From: Phys-l [mailto:phys-l-bounces@phys-l.org] On Behalf Of Marty Weiss
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 10:48 AM
To: Forum for Physics Educators
Subject: Re: [Phys-L] teaching credentials +- qualifications +- administration
You know what would REALLY tick them off? Evaluations on the basis of
monthly observations of their teaching and the progress their students make
on university mandated testing (tests constructed by peers and
administrators).
On Oct 21, 2013, at 10:26 AM, brian whatcott wrote:
On 10/20/2013 6:36 PM, Marc "Zeke" Kossover wrote [in small part]:high school teacher though they have never taught and never hired
.... many people think that they know what would make a person a great
someone to teach. They would probably be ticked off if I were to suggest
how their universities should hire professors.
hired on the basis of a statistic like the quotient of number of papersWould they be as ticked off if you suggested that university professors be
Zeke Kossover
published in refereed journals and number of cites in refereed journals with
a suitable multiplier for the count accumulated in journals of the first water -
Science, Nature, NEJM and the like, and a hugely bigger multiplier for Nobel
awards in any field?
Brian Whatcott Altus OK
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l