Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-L] ? FCI --> momentum flow



My personal feeling is that Newton's approach to force is much closer to a student's concept of force. His definition was that two forces are in the same ratio as the distances moved by an object starting from rest and acted upon by those forces for the same time interval. It is a direct connection between force and the visible distance an object is moved - very clear and intuitive.

Bob at PC

-----Original Message-----
From: Phys-l [mailto:phys-l-bounces@phys-l.org] On Behalf Of Moses
Fayngold
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 10:00 AM
To: Phys-L@Phys-L.org
Subject: Re: [Phys-L] ? FCI --> momentum flow



Marty Weiss wrote:
To Phys-L@Phys-L.orgMe
Oct 14 at 11:43 AM
      >Maybe I'm missing something here.  Is diSessa saying there is no force
between your butt and the chair?
     > Both are affected by gravity.  Your butt is 'pressing down' on the chair
(gravity) and the chair is exerting an equal and opposite        > force on your
butt."   Otherwise you would fall to the floor.

  No, I did not mean that diSessa had directly said this. But his quoted
statement, when applied straightforwardly to described situation, may
mislead the students into believing this. A far more accurate statement
would be: The net zero momentum flow through a closed surface only
means the zero NET force on the object enclosed by the surface. But it does
not say anything about possible interaction forces between a certain part of
this object and the environment. Similarly, the zero momentum flow through
an open surface element (e.g., through the seat of the chair on which I am
sitting) only means that the action-reaction forces between the objects on
the opposite sides of the surface are opposite and equal in magnitude. It
does not say anything about the actual magnitude. To find it, in the above
example, I need to insert the scale between my butt and the chair. But this
takes us back to the "old-fashioned" direct measurement of the force.

   > Likewise, the chair is affected by gravity but the floor is exerting an equal
and opposite force on the chair.  And on and on... the        > floor and support
walls, the walls and the foundation... etc. My students always ask where
does it end?

It does end with the whole planet Earth taken into the picture.
 Moses Fayngold,, NJIT






On Monday, October 14, 2013 1:15 PM, John Denker <jsd@av8n.com> wrote:

On 10/14/2013 08:43 AM, Marty Weiss wrote:
Is diSessa saying there is no force between your butt and the chair?

OK, these are good questions, please keep 'em coming.  The questions tell
me there are gaps in the story I'm trying to tell.

Just now I added a section that addresses this:
  http://www.av8n.com/physics/force-intro.htm#sec-balanced-forces

There is a stack of books which sits on a scale, which sits on a table, which sits
on the ground.

This is an equilibrium situation.  Downward momentum flows in a closed
circuit, upward from the earth to the books, downward through the scale,
downward through the table-leg, and back into the earth.

  My students always ask where does it end?

It never ends.  The momentum flows around and around, in a closed loop, a
closed circuit, with no net accumulation anywhere.  This is characteristic of
equilibrium.  For details and diagrams, see
  http://www.av8n.com/physics/force-intro.htm#sec-balanced-forces

In my experience, students don't have a problem with this.
They have a pretty good intuition about conservative flow in a loop.  If
anybody isn't happy with this, bring in a big round bowl of water and stir up a
rotational flow.
The water is conserved.  The water is flowing, but there is no accumulation
anywhere.

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l