Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-L] [SPAM] Re: form of Newtons 2nd law

From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:07:01 -0700

On 2012, Jul 26, , at 18:42, Paul Lulai wrote:

however, F=ma is more convenient when dealing with typical force problems in which there are multiple forces.
Ffriction + Fapply + Fcontact =ma
also, plotting F vs a gives you a nice linear graph.

Yes! m*A = - c*V - omega^2 * x + F (t)

bc into SHOs (and not so simple).

References:
- Re: [Phys-L] form of Newtons 2nd law
  - From: Chuck Britton <cvbritton@embarqmail.com>
- Re: [Phys-L] [SPAM] Re: form of Newtons 2nd law
  - From: "Anthony Lapinski" <Anthony_Lapinski@pds.org>
- Re: [Phys-L] [SPAM] Re: form of Newtons 2nd law
  - From: Paul Lulai <plulai@stanthony.k12.mn.us>

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-L] form of Newtons 2nd law
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-L] form of Newtons 2nd law
Previous by thread: Re: [Phys-L] [SPAM] Re: form of Newtons 2nd law
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-L] [SPAM] Re: form of Newtons 2nd law
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread