Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-L] Does anyone doubt that one political party is against science and education?



Far be it for me to ascribe any such thinking to them.
There is no thinking involved here.

We've got the best government that money can buy.

.
At 7:50 AM -0700 7/2/12, John Mallinckrodt wrote:
Careful now. As I understand it, control of the North Carolina legislature was recently taken over by the Republicans for the first time in a century. So I certainly hope nobody is suggesting that this indicates an antiscience attitude on their part. That would be inappropriate here.

John Mallinckrodt
Cal Poly Pomona

On Jul 2, 2012, at 4:35 AM, Chuck Britton wrote:

For what it's worth - the Great Legislators here in North Carolina
have now outlawed any mathematical model for sea level rise that
isn't linear and based solely upon their prescribed historical data
set.
.
At 11:35 PM -0400 7/1/12, Jeff Bigler wrote:
If the Texachusylvania Republicratic party had passed a law defining g
to be 9.8000000 m/s^2 everywhere in the universe, that would be different.
--
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l