Re: [Phys-L] [Phys-l] testing because my "reply " hasn't posted in an hour of waiting.

[Bill Nettles <bnettles@uu.edu>]

The problem was that my school's spam filter had caught almost all of the new traffic since the restart.  It even flagged my own post, but didn't throw away JD's.  It will be interesting to see how long it takes to learn that phys-l is less innocuous spam than most.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: phys-l-bounces@www.phys-l.org [mailto:phys-l-
> bounces@www.phys-l.org] On Behalf Of Ludwik Kowalski
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 2:50 PM
> To: phys-L new
> Subject: Re: [Phys-l] testing because my "reply " hasn't posted in an hour of
> waiting.
>
> In sharing our email address with others I prefer to type it as phys-L@phys-
> L.org (Using the capital L avoids a possible ambiguity (the lower case L versus
> the capital case I.) Is our email address case-sensitive? I hope not.
>
> Ludwik
> ====================================
>
>
> On Apr 30, 2012, at 3:07 PM, Bill Nettles wrote:
>
> > Testing the new email phys-l@phys-l.org<mailto:phys-l@phys-l.org>
> >
> > B Nettles
> > x6588
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Forum for Physics Educators
> > Phys-l@www.phys-l.org
> > http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@www.phys-l.org
> http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l